Credit Data Auditor

CRA reinvestigation after a consumer dispute

needs research· statutory · US · fcra.reinvestigation.cra v1 · file sha256 ef26804503ae…

This rule is not verified. Its text, elements and any period parameters are research placeholders written for human review. Findings based on it are capped at Plausible/Weak and documents cannot cite it as verified authority.

Rationale

Seed rule. The 30-day figure is a placeholder to be anchored to the primary text; the extension amount is deliberately not encoded until verified.

Authorities

Links open public legal sources in your browser; this application itself never fetches them.

Primary-source snapshots

None on file. Import one with cda rules import-source.

Verification record

No human verification record.

Applies to

Account types: any · Circumstances: none required

Required elements

ElementFact testedTestQuote anchor
The bureau received a dispute of the completeness or accuracy of the item (date of receipt known)event.cra_dispute_receivedknownno anchor yet
The bureau did not treat the dispute as frivolous or irrelevant optionalevent.cra_dispute_frivolous_noticeunknownno anchor yet

Exceptions / limitations

Calculation

method days_from_event · params {'trigger_fact': 'event.cra_dispute_received', 'days': 30} · parameters are part of the rule and inherit its verification status.

Contrary considerations

Potential outcomes (not predictions)

reinvestigation_period_running

Routes this rule can suggest

All rules